I think when it all comes down to it; the people who decide
what good writing is are critics and scholars. They usually get to decide
because critics review and pick apart things for a living, so why would it be
any different with books? Scholars get to decide what good writing is because they’ve
gone through years of school and are supposedly very educated on writing. While
there are scholars who’re educated exclusively on writing, many of them are
not. They expect everyone to agree with their opinions on books, but we all
have different tastes and interests. We as readers should decide what a good
piece of writing for many reasons: One being that we are the majority. Since we
are the ones who are reading books, it’s up to us to decide whether or not it’s
good. I think it’s seriously wrong for us to believe everything critics spew
out of their mouths. Another reason we should decide because one person can’t
decide if a book is good enough. For every person who thinks the writing in a
book is good, there is one who thinks it is not. Like I said, we all have
different opinions. That is what’s so great about reading. It is up to you to
decide to read a certain book or not, and it’s up to you to either love the
style of writing, or hate it. We as a whole will never all have the same
opinions on a book. Many of us do, but many of us don’t. For example, The Hunger Games; I know that many, many
people really love this book. I for one really do enjoy it. But the beginning starts
out way too fast for my taste. I like books that slowly build up anticipation,
but I’m sure other people like books that just dive right into the main plot. This
further proves my point on how everyone has different tastes. We as readers should
most definitely decide what’s good, and what’s bad.
No comments:
Post a Comment